Hi Walt,
I remember you writing about your neutered KP60 before. Frankly, I
wouldn't be surprised if your good fortune were related to what your
KP60 is missing. Anyone with experience in audio knows that the less
complicated the signal path is, the more faithful the signal will
be. I don't know whether that's what's going on with mine, though.
My first KP60--not this one--was a complete dud. Midwest Percussion
put me directly in touch with Yamaha ("Dave," but not the earlier
Yamaha "Dave" from the archives). He suggested that applying a hot
soldering iron to the connections might do the trick; it didn't. He
then sent a new sensor, and when that failed, he sent a new unit
altogether. Something in the circuit board obviously wasn't right.
Yamaha was very nice and very prompt about everything. But the KP60
appears to be a weak link. My new one is by no means terrible, but a
dropout at any time is frustrating. Hopefully, as lockhardt
suggests, the right tweak is waiting. otherwise, if I get cranky
enough, so long to my sensitivity and polarity controls--and
probably my warranty. But don't get me wrong. I love this thing.
--- In DTXpress@y..., "wgardus" <wgardus@y...> wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> Here's my two cents worth -
>
> I have both a Vertikik and a KP60 (although it was nuetered by a
> previous owner, removing the polarity and sensitivity
electronics),
> and I would say they are dead even in performance, and I have not
had
> dropouts with either.
>
> Walt
>
> --- In DTXpress@y..., "liberatusvirus" <edtyct@m...> wrote:
> > Searching through the archives I found a lot of the same kinds
of
> > problems with the KP60 that I asked about last week,
particularly
> > dropouts, regardless of gain, rejection, and min. vel. settings.
Is
> > the Pintech Verikik more reliable? What else have people done?
> >
> > EdMessage
Re: KP60 again
2002-02-08 by liberatusvirus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.