Stewart, I own a Drum Tech Pole Pad and love it, but here's why I don't believe that the plan to split the rim off will work. I'm quoting from another post that I wrote when younger and could think better: Input 9/10 will handle two mono FSRs or two piezos but not one piezo and one membrane switch from a "stereo" pad or cymbal, because stereo pads and inputs have a totally different electronic makeup than their dual-zone, or mono, counterparts. Inputs 1-8, as combinations of 1 piezo/2 membrane switches (or FSRs), would seem, in principle, to permit a triggering opportunity for the two independent FSRs of a BP 80 or its equivalent if you could just get to them. The problem is that those two membrane switches are not independent triggers. Their open and closed positions (membranes are basically open/close toggles) determine what sound the piezo is going to make--whether the sound programed to the rim, the body, or a choke; the switches are, if you will, slaves to the piezo. The timing of how the interaction between them takes place, not to mention the delicacy of their relative physical locations in the pad, is complicated. But the upshot is that creative cabling won't help you; those inputs are by nature single piezo inputs. You can't treat the "stereo" or "trio" inputs as taking multiple mono feeds, whether piezos or FSRs. Anyway, that's my understanding. --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "moosetication" <moosetication@y...> wrote: > --- I wrote: > > And it would be interesting to see if > > there are any triggers on the market that > > are just FSRs... > > And lo and behold, the Drum-Tech Pole Pad is a dual-zone FSR. Not > exactly inexpensive, mind. > > Stewart
Message
Re: DTXpress II upgrade plan
2003-05-01 by liberatusvirus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.