--- "liberatusvirus" wrote: > But how do you qualify the interaction between > various sorts of untuned, differentially resonant > things... Oh, I'm not claiming it's either easy or an equivalent problem. It certainly seems that sampling such interactions on a piano is somewhat more deterministic than an acoustic drum kit. After all, piano strings are also supposed to be pitched just so, of a known length, struck in a given place, arranged a known distance apart, and so on. However, (with respect) smarter minds than mine or yours will have worked on this and if they can get even close (perhaps just modeling the interactions within a single piece of percussion) then groovy things may be in the offing. For example... what do most of us complain about most? Cymbals, I'd guess. It doesn't seem to be beyond the realms of hope that they can make a better job there using these sorts of techniques. Here's hoping. Well, actually probably not. If it is that good, I won't be able to afford it! Stewart
Message
Re: higher quality sounds with a sampler
2003-05-09 by moosetication
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.