So we would ideally want the benefits of electronics drums minus the flaws of acoustic drums? -UN.H --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "liberatusvirus" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > Stewart, > > Better minds than ours? Perish the thought. It's an exciting > prospect, and balancing it with the issue that Vern raises makes it > all the more interesting. We have nothing to gain here but knowledge. > > Ed > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "moosetication" > <moosetication@y...> wrote: > > --- "liberatusvirus" wrote: > > > But how do you qualify the interaction between > > > various sorts of untuned, differentially resonant > > > things... > > > > Oh, I'm not claiming it's either easy or an equivalent problem. It > > certainly seems that sampling such interactions on a piano is > > somewhat more deterministic than an acoustic drum kit. After all, > > piano strings are also supposed to be pitched just so, of a known > > length, struck in a given place, arranged a known distance apart, > and > > so on. However, (with respect) smarter minds than mine or yours > will > > have worked on this and if they can get even close (perhaps just > > modeling the interactions within a single piece of percussion) > then > > groovy things may be in the offing. For example... what do most of > us > > complain about most? Cymbals, I'd guess. It doesn't seem to be > beyond > > the realms of hope that they can make a better job there using > these > > sorts of techniques. > > > > Here's hoping. Well, actually probably not. If it is that good, I > > won't be able to afford it! > > > > Stewart
Message
Re: higher quality sounds with a sampler
2003-05-09 by underneathheaven
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.