--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "moosetication" <moosetication@y...> wrote: > --- "prog_uk" wrote: > > Any further advice on using a TP65S for > > the hi-hat? > > Do it. Much, much nicer than a pad. The edge works really quite > acceptably. Just what I wanted to hear. It's the lack of an edge sound in the current setup that's annoying me as I feel it's needed to add realism to the hi-hat. > The only wrinkles I found when adding cymbals were: > > * Mounting the hi-hat. I thought long and hard about this one. Being > under budgetary constraints, an X-hat was out of the question. In > the end I got an ex-demo Gibraltar multiclamp for £10, and a new DW > cymbal stacker for about the same, and clamped the latter in the > former. I'll take a detailed photo if you're interested. A photo would be great if it's not a problem. > I could > have economized futher by just clamping a long 8mm bolt into the > multiclamp. You may be able to find something in the spares bin at > your local drum shop. I'll have a word with the guys at Nottingham Drum Centre (quick plug for my local drum shop!) > * Stabilizers. Yamaha charge an *unbelievable* price for those > simple l-shaped stabilizer things ... about £14 as spare parts. > Outrageous. I haven't figured out that one yet. It's not an issue > for the hat, as it's clamped tight, but it is for the extra crash. > There are photos in the group from (I think) hairytrigger who made > one out of a bolt coupler. Interesting. I'd assumed that the stabiliser thing (what is the correct name I wonder?) would come with the pad. £14 is indeed an outrageous price so I'll definitely look into the bolt coupler idea. > * Availability. I punted for TP80s off eBay as I was quoted 8 weeks > lead time for almost all DTXpress components new. Buying them in the > US is tricky, as in theory they shouldn't post new Yamaha gear > overseas (check out Drumbalaya). I'm in the UK so the US thing doesn't come into it for me which sounds like a good thing in this case. If only we were having better weather :-)
Message
Re: '80' pads vs '65' pads
2003-07-06 by prog_uk
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.