--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "jtatsuoka" <jtatsuoka@y...> wrote: > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "liberatusvirus" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > The original poster mentioned compatibility with the Roland snare and kick. For the mesh head portion of the snare and the kick you will > need a potentiometer. The signal from the rim of the snare might not need it or is too weak because the rubber on the rim acts as an > attenuator. Probably the same with the material on the Roland cymbals. The fact that you were not able to use the Roland cymbal, > because of a weak signal, proves that the DTXpress does NOT have an input gain. If it did you would have been able to turn the > sensitivity up. The DTXpress does have a 'gain' and 'mvel' but as you know decreasing the 'gain' does not affect the percentage that > shows up on the display. The picture of the Yamaha pad by OGD depicts a surface mount potentiometer on the little circuit board. Try > turning that up and down. You will experience either too much or too little gai > I believe Pintech had any module with a sensitivity knob in mind not just Roland. Pintech used to advertise with Alesis modules until > Roland bought them out. Yamaha modules are the only modules on the market that lack an input sensitivity. Even the lowly Alesis D4 > has one. > > Ed, you use Pintech? What values are your 'gain' and 'mvel' set at? Are you experiencing a 'perfect percentage' response? If you are > reaching 99% before maximun velocity, you should try spicing a cheap cable and inserting a 250k pot. Set your 'gain=99' and 'mvel=1' > and adjust the pot until you achieve optimum performance. Jun, Thanks. Yes, I use Pintech meshes for the snare and all toms. I've come to an understanding with my setup, which includes flipped up DIP switches on the back of the module, toms with moderate gain and min vel., and snare on separate stand with a low min. vel, and fairly high gain. Playing with what must pass for a relatively delicate touch from the likes of me has been getting satisfactory results, but I will experiment when I can and report back. Maybe we should prevail on Yamaha to change their strategy, which seems to be an attempt to dissuade the use of other company's pads, though the results don't seem definitive enough for that. Now I'm wondering whether the lack of input sensitivity on the module is responsible for Hart's spotty performance with Yamaha electronics. If so, why didn't Peter Hart say so when we told him about the problems, instead of claiming to look into them but remaining mute. This would not seem to be too difficult to figure out, if Yamaha differs from everyone else in this respect. Ed
Message
Re: help! regarding the compability of roland pads...
2003-09-08 by liberatusvirus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.