RIAA SUITS: I don't download songs from the internet nor do I buy CD's from the stores, here's why: When I was a youngster, 45's and LP's was the standard. When a one hit wonder group came along, I could go to the store and spend 25 cents to buy a 45 that had just the one song that was being played a thousand times a day (plus only one lame song on the backside) on the radio, because I wanted to listen to it a thousand and one times. Most of the albums from even the top ten groups of the time had at most 2 or three good songs and 10 lame half-bake songs. Buying an album was getting the "industry there share" but it was screwing me the consumer because I had to pay for the lame songs as well as the good songs. When cassettes and 8-tracks came along, I was stuck with buying the whole album (2 good/10 bad songs) and the industry got their share and I got screwed. With the advent of CD's the cycle continued. The industry today finds a blonde/brunnette teenager that can sing that sells one successful song and proceeds to clone her with a dozen other one/two album hit wonders. I will not buy a $17 cd that has only one or two songs on it. I still listen and play to this music, but not from an over priced ripoff CD but from the Radio.(Can you imagine a artist (painter,sculpter) pulling together 12 paintings, with two nice ones and 10 stupid ones and selling them as a bundle for one high price?) I did purchased the Elton John CD that had the tribute to Princess Diana song, but have not purchased since, nor do I ever intend to purchase music from the industry. There was a good article that I read yesterday, that talked about the difference between Piracy and copyright infringement. (I can't find it now.) The record industry had already been taken to court and lost over price fixing. (What a good example to set for youngster of this country on how business should be run.) There are two other major reasons I am angered by the industry: One is that the large corporations have chosen to hide behind the RIAA like weasels, so that thier names will not be used in the public relations nightmare (i.e. RIAA sues 12 year NYC girl, instead of Sony sues 12 year NYC girl being the headlines on the Washington Post). The second is that is that two wrongs don't make a right. When someone chooses to use a file-swapping service they give free access to their computer's hard for other file swappers and not the industry/governement. This would be like me having a library at home, that I freely allowed my neighbors and friends to come in and use and the industry/big brother shows up and starts purusing my home. I only gave permission for entry into my home for other files sharers/friends and not the industry/police. Your hard drive at home is your personnal property, period. If you are breaking the law, it is up to the law enforcement to investigate and get a search warrant to search your private property and not for a third party to break into your home (electronically) and search for evidence and then sneak back out and then get a search warrant. If someone steals your computer and takes it home with him, you as an individual cannot break into thier house to see if it is there and take it back. You must go to law enforcement and let them determine if enough evidence exists to obtain an search warrant and seek a resolution though the court system. Clearly, the lawsuits could be stopped within a week, but the effort would have to be a massive cooperation by all US Citizens. If everyone were to stop buying say Sony products (TV,VCR,computers,music,videos,etc.) for one week and let it be known that the other members that are represented by the RIAA are next, the suits would go away overnight. If Sony wants I have alot more to say about this but my fingers are tired and so I will stop for now. Sorry for the rant and raving. OGD ************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________
Message
RE: [DTXpress] RIAA suit of music sharers
2003-09-10 by rdamon@mckinney-usa.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.