> Ed wrote: I doubt if the "design flaw" would qualify > as "planned obselescence," but the effect would be the same. > > Ed, An interesting design issue is: Why Yamaha chose to use the spring on the bottom of the HH65 to lift top plate pedal only and not to lift both the "top plate pedal and the rubber wedge" together? This simple change would assure that the rubber wedge, even it were to stretch a little, it would be forced off the FSR ribben located on the bottom plate and all but eliminate the hanging loss of the fully open position. OGD ************************************************************************** The information transmitted herewith is sensitive information intended only for use to the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, retransmission, dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from your computer. ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information on a proactive email security service working around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com ________________________________________________________________________
Message
RE: [DTXpress] Re: HH Pedal gets stuck!!!
2003-10-15 by rdamon@mckinney-usa.com
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.