--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Jay" <jayluv6@y...> wrote: > ok, i may be missing something here, but how do you roll on a cymbal > without it sounding like banging on a cheapa$$ keyboard? is there any > way to make it sound natural? this is the first flaw i've seen with > the DTX so far, and it's a pretty big one. along the same lines, > choking the cymbal sounds completely fake as well. what's the deal? is > there any way to make those crashes sound like a real cymbal? > > and if you haven't checked it out yet, download my song > (01_01-04-2004.mp3 in the MP3 folder). i'm dying for some feedback!!! I agree. Cymbal rolling is a weakness of the DTXpress module. The module seems unable to compensate for the fact that each new strike of an e-cymbal, unlike that of an acoustic cymbal, is a completely new event, without the benefit of the natural vibration and decay of the one that preceded it. Experimenting with the decay setting in the voice menu might help a little bit, and certain cymbal sounds may be incrementally better than others, but the machine-gun effect generally remains in evidence. If it's any consolation, I've noticed that the brand of cymbal can make a difference as well (but don't ask me to explain how). The choking seems fake because it is . . . well, fake. I never thought that it was so bad, though, except for unwanted chokes, which is bad enough. But apparently the PCY65S is better in that respect than the 80S. The more expensive modules tend to handle these functions more gracefully. Once the bit and sampling rates improve, and samples begin either to carry more information or to link up with better effects, cymbal rolling at a modest price should become more realistic. Ddrum, for example, is much more convincing in that regard, despite having only an 18 bit engine. Ed
Message
Re: Cymbal Rolls
2004-01-12 by emf
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.