this works best when done on a non-choking cymbal, but the nature of midi is that each hit is a new event which re-initiates the sound in the module. This stops the reverb you so carefully set up in your voice settings. If you think about it- the self-rejection setting is one aspect of this design and might actually make the stutter effect worse. Recently I was playing some music that required a cymbal roll with mallets- I used an actual cymbal. -----Original Message----- From: emf [mailto:liberatusvirus@...] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 2:53 PM To: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com Subject: [DTXpress] Re: Cymbal Rolls --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Jay" <jayluv6@y...> wrote: > ok, i may be missing something here, but how do you roll on a cymbal > without it sounding like banging on a cheapa$$ keyboard? is there any > way to make it sound natural? this is the first flaw i've seen with > the DTX so far, and it's a pretty big one. along the same lines, > choking the cymbal sounds completely fake as well. what's the deal? is > there any way to make those crashes sound like a real cymbal? > > and if you haven't checked it out yet, download my song > (01_01-04-2004.mp3 in the MP3 folder). i'm dying for some feedback!!! I agree. Cymbal rolling is a weakness of the DTXpress module. The module seems unable to compensate for the fact that each new strike of an e-cymbal, unlike that of an acoustic cymbal, is a completely new event, without the benefit of the natural vibration and decay of the one that preceded it. Experimenting with the decay setting in the voice menu might help a little bit, and certain cymbal sounds may be incrementally better than others, but the machine-gun effect generally remains in evidence. If it's any consolation, I've noticed that the brand of cymbal can make a difference as well (but don't ask me to explain how). The choking seems fake because it is . . . well, fake. I never thought that it was so bad, though, except for unwanted chokes, which is bad enough. But apparently the PCY65S is better in that respect than the 80S. The more expensive modules tend to handle these functions more gracefully. Once the bit and sampling rates improve, and samples begin either to carry more information or to link up with better effects, cymbal rolling at a modest price should become more realistic. Ddrum, for example, is much more convincing in that regard, despite having only an 18 bit engine. Ed Community email addresses: Post message: DTXpress@yahoogroups.com Subscribe: DTXpress-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe: DTXpress-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com List owner: DTXpress-owner@yahoogroups.com Shortcut URL to this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DTXpress Alternate DTXpress site: http://www.dtxpressions.com Yahoo! Groups Links To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DTXpress/ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: DTXpress-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/2003
Message
RE: [DTXpress] Re: Cymbal Rolls
2004-01-13 by Creighton Higgins
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.