--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "jjcorley0000" <jjc@s...> wrote: > > The SysEx spec errors concern me a bit. Do you have any more > information on them? Since I'm working with four versions > (DTXpressI/II/II and DTXtremeI) and they are very similar, I've been > able to answer a few questions by cross checking the other specs, > particularly the DTXtreme as it's manual and has a bit more text with > it. The errors I've found to date are pretty minor but they need to be corrected to get things working. ---------------------------------------- The spec says: B.1 bulk dump - systam data system data - 202 bytes But I think it should be: B.1 bulk dump - system data system data - 203 bytes ----------------------------------------- The spec says: drumkit data - 1066 bytes ------------------------------------------------------- offset type range name ------------------------------------------------------- 0 UC*8 ASCII name 8 UC 0-127 volume 9 UC 0-127 reverb return level 10 UC 0-127 reverb send level 11 UC 0-11 reverb type 12 UC 0-69 reverb time 13 UC 0-63 HH sens 14 UC 0-127 song select 15 UC 0-2 tempo select MSB 16 UC 0-127 tempo select LSB 17 3bytes - reserve 20 [DRSRC]*25 970 [DRTR]*16 ------------------------------------------------------- But I think it should be: drumkit data 1070 bytes ------------------------------------------------------- offset type range name ------------------------------------------------------- 0 UC*12 ASCII name 12 UC 0-127 volume 13 UC 0-127 reverb return level 14 UC 0-127 reverb send level 15 UC 0-11 reverb type 16 UC 0-69 reverb time 17 UC 0-63 HH sens 18 UC 0-127 song select 19 UC 0-2 tempo select MSB 20 UC 0-127 tempo select LSB 21 3bytes - reserve 24 [DRSRC]*25 974 [DRTR]*16 ------------------------------------------------------- The spec says: OB64 0:-64, 1:-32, ... 32:0, 33:+1, ... 64:+32 OB127 0:-127, 1:-62, ... 64:0, 65:+1, ...127:+63 But I think it should be: OB64 0:-32, 1:-31, ... 32:0, 33:+1, ... 64:+32 OB127 0:-64, 1:-63, ... 64:0, 65:+1, ...127:+63 However, I haven't tested this last one yet, I'm just guessing that is what they really meant. I'll let you know if I find any others, or let me know if you think I've got this wrong somehow. Cheers, Peter
Message
Re: Sysex Bulk Dump Data
2004-02-02 by the_kin_doc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.