--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "Keith" <keith@k...> wrote: > > I am planning to design and build the "magic box" but I seem to > > remember a post around the same time as this one that gave the > maximum > > time between the rinm switch closing and the piezo triggering (or > vice > > versa) to get the required sound from the rim. I have searched the > > archives but cannot find it again. Does anyone know the answer. It > > is important because if the rim switch needs to be closed before the > > piezo triggers I will need to add a small delay in the "rim" piezo > > signal because I will not be able to close the rim switch signal > > before the piezo has been hit. > > Within the limits of possible measurements on our scale, the two > events are simultaneous, or as OGD put it, "The piezo and the rim > switch have to be triggered within micro-seconds of each other or the > rim will not trigger the sound assigned to it." OGD's experiment > permitted no perceptible lag time. > > Ed Thanks, I thought someone had actually measured it, but it may have just been a subjective "microseconds" I remember. I will have to experiment or get the oscilloscope and signal generator moved into the drum room and measure it. I suspect I will need to close the switch just before the piezo which means I will need to delay the piezo signal slightly from the pad being used as a rim input. One strange thing I noticed is that if you hold the rim switch closed it ignores it! Keith.
Message
Re: Follow-Up on the TP65S Experiment
2004-04-27 by Keith
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.