--- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "emf" <liberatusvirus@y...> wrote: > --- In DTXpress@yahoogroups.com, "zapaxe" <a_zapelectric@h...> wrote: > > I was hoping that if the DTX 2.0 has more outputs, I can put the > > snare for example onto it's own track into my Cubase recording DAW > > for better control. > > Steve, > > Now that I think about it, I seem to recall that the DTX had two > auxiliary outputs, in addition to the L/R stereo ones that the DTXP > has. You might be able to do exactly what you want. > > Ed Yeah the DTX (if that's the one with the sliders vs rackmount brain) has aux outs so you can assign and pan kick on one snare on another then toms on one and cymbals to the last one... pretty much the ONLY way to really record "live" e-drums. Alternately I'm thinking about tracking midi (I'm getting an xpress III soon) and then just muting the other parts when it's time to dump down to audio... so just kick and snare one pass then go back and do toms and hats then maybe even another pass for ride and cymbals... does anyone see a problem with doing that? latency or anything... seems like it should work but I haven't recieved my set yet to try it out! I wish the phones out could double as an aux out... damn cheap a$$'s, honestly how are you really to use this thing in a live situation... granted I'm actually a sound engineer by trade so I want indivual control over everything but still... you need everything seperate... how can you do reverb tricks with toms and such... I would just be pissed if my drummer was getting an xpress and taking away all my cool snare rever tricks and special effects! Hope that helps, sorry for the rant ;) Gilligan
Message
Re: DTXpress 1, or DTX 2.0 Module What's better and newer.
2004-05-25 by Kevin Richard
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.