another here who agrees. I've often wondered how miracles could be wrought by some I've heard who claim to have so automated their workflow that there is no such thing as a "test" print, just a final print.Even with all of the controls we now have over the process I think the artistic decisions are only met by seeing the print and iteration to the point one is sick of looking at the thing and moves on to the next image ...to rinse and repeat. Duane --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "tboleyyh" <tyler@...> wrote: > > but I have to agree with Jon, though many initial large moves may be done on the monitor, the decisions that make for a print with that something extra are done by seeing how things are working out on paper. That hasn't changed... at least when it comes to printing. > Tyler >
Message
Re: Is Camera Raw enough? - ironic observation
2010-04-15 by dlruckus
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.