On 14/04/10 10:34 PM, "tboleyyh" <tyler@...> wrote: > But then there are those who are printmakers, which I aspire to, for whom the > object is the thing, the image being an inseparable essential part of it, but > not all of it. > The monitor image is not the thing, the > print's the thing man. > The other explanation is we're all delusional and stone cold crazy. Photography came alive for me in the black and white darkroom. For a period of about 10 years, after moving into a very small house, I did not have space for a darkroom and I stopped taking photographs. There seemed no point. What started me up again was digital. Being able to edit and print images brought photography back to life for me. I've heard it said that the print is your voice. Everything leading up to the print (image capture and editing) are all in service of the print. That makes a lot of sense to me. Terry.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Is Camera Raw enough? - ironic observation
2010-04-15 by Terry Ritz
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.