Digital BW, The Print

Thanks, Paul for the quick feedback, as usual.

Now that I know the ink is the same, do I now use the UT7 you've written to configure the printer?  And, I've printed out some of the info on your website; but, can you direct me to your recommended link so I'll get it right.

Also, what considerations should I give to using QTR, which I do plan to use to print through?

Thanks, Mike


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> 
>   "mbrouphy" <mbrouphy@> wrote:
> 
> > Are these two inksets compatible in terms of their native chemistry.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > If so, then the dilutions could be manipulated by some variable amount
> to utilize in different printers. Specifically, I have a 1280 using the
> MIS CFS system to support the UT2 Eboni set.
> 
> The carbon inks are the same, but the cooled "toner" inks are different
> blends.  The positions of the toner and carbon inks were swapped.
> 
> >
> > ... the 2200? That's my target printer. I'd like to be able to either
> use both printers on the same inkset to hold my costs down or get rid of
> the 1280 and use just the 2200.
> 
> The UT7 LK is not a pure carbon LK.  It has been neutralized a bit.  One
> of the problems with K2 and K3 printers and the variable tone inksets is
> that the gray substitution of the Epson driver interferes with the tone
> controls via PS curves.  You'll notice I never bothered with a K3
> variable tone like the UT7.  The Y=EZ-Warm was it.
> 
> Paul
> 
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com>
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>