Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: UT7 and UT2 Ink Compatibility

2010-07-19 by mbrouphy

Thanks...all I need now is to get a set of empty carts for the 2200.  Too bad the ones for the c86 won't fit.  After I get them and get things going, a task in itself, I'll deal with bifurcating my CFS so that it feeds both printers.  Thanks again, Mike
 

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> "mbrouphy" <mbrouphy@> wrote:
> >
> > ... I'm still a bit snowed by the LK/LLK issue, though.  If the LK is ignored then how is it accounted for in the profile?
> 
> In QTR LK would be "Not Used."  (You would have some cart in it -- like a clear base, perhaps the C6 generic base I use or MIS UC base or cleaning fluid.)
> 
> The thought was that maybe there would be a way to unify to a certain extent the approaches -- inksets as well as profiles -- for the 6 and 7 ink printers by just ignoring the 7th position.
> 
> If you're not very familiar with QTR or profiling, however, you might want to consider stepping back to some inkset that is already set up with profiles.
> 
> 
> > 
> > BTW - Your article on UT7 refers to the setup for Arches Watercolor.  Have you had any experience with the Epson Fine Art Watercolor paper...
> 
> They are very different papers.  The water color papers made for inkjets are coated paper just like the smooth ones, except that they put a texture on them to simulate the look of a watercolor paper.  The  Arches is an un-coated paper (the real thing).
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.