I can think of a way to make a qtr curve that would maximise the use of the 2% dilution as follows(think it would work?) In addition to using a qtr-BO(for cooling/neutrality) curve and a qtr-eb6 curve one could make a third "cooling" qtr curve (also for "cooling" as you seem to suggest). This third qtr curve would only use eboni-mk and the 2% dilution. by increasing the ink limit of the 2% dilution sufficiently (without going overboard) one could create a curve in qtr which would maximise the use of 2%. then, for final printing one could blend the three curves(BO, EB6, and max2%) in order to maximise smoothness while keeping tone cooler. I might be totally off. have not used qtr in 3 years and am waiting for my epson 1400 along with my EB6 inks!!! looking forward to your inks paul! --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote: > > "pdesmidt tds.net" <pdesmidt@> wrote: > > > > > > So one candidate inkset would be: > > Eboni, > > 30% Eboni > > 18% Eboni, > > 9% Eboni, > > 6% Eboni, > > 2% Eboni > > That is the standard Eboni/Carbon-6 set. > > > > With these inks two spaces would still be available. > > Yes, that's why the recommended full K3 set uses Eb6-M and LM (18% and 6%) as the Lk and LLk also. This allows an ICC controlled, Epson driver workflow, which I believe is the easiest. > > I prefer an ICC made with the QTR Create ICC-RGB program and an embedded Photoshop curve that uses the maximum 2% dilution. It makes a very easy, color managed workflow that prints the most neutral prints on the low-delta-b papers. > > > > Perhaps adding MIS LK > > and LLK would be valuable as warm toners? > > Yes, if you like warmer images on matte paper, the MIS glossy carbon pigments will do the job. These get to about Lab b = 8 on typical papers. If you add an MIS PK and print on glossy paper, you get to lab b = 14. And that's beginning to look like a true sepia tone. > > > > Would there be any advantages to using a base other than > > C6a (55% distilled water, 35% glycerol, and 10% Kodak > > Photo-Flow 200, all by weight.) > > Yes, I think it's worthwhile to use the Edwal surfactant (dilution base C6b (p.5 of http://www.paulroark.com/BW-Info/Ink-Mixing.pdf) > as well as Photo-Flo. It's readily available and the additional surfactant seems to help with respect to not only a little smoothness but also maybe cleaning (as least in the test tube). > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: Number of dilutions versus doubling up inks
2010-12-11 by Yan
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.