Paul..
I use Premier Art shield on virtually ALL my UT-14 B&W prints (glossy or matte), and I find it's a GREAT "leveler' for the finish on Ilford Gold. I ALSO use it on ALL my dye-based prints (with the exception of super-glossy or pearl metallic)..sprayed glossy prints lose a touch fof their shimmer with the spray, but you still can tell it's a glossy (and acceptable IMHO..
Eddie
----- Original Message -----
From: Paul
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, December 25, 2010 9:01 AM
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test data -- Aardenburg Imaging
Definitely worth it! I do some photography for architects who are submitting buildings for National Historic Register standing, and I have also been in touch with the Register... they are accepting my 3MK Eboni prints as meeting their archival standards.
So I would say the Aardenburg tests enhance my work.
What do members of this group think about using Premier Art Print Shield spray? I make it a habit of using it on my prints... it's supposed to increase longevity and provide some scuff resistance - among other advantages.
Happy Holidays to all,
Paul
--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> Some new test results have been posted.
>
> See http://www.aardenburg-imaging.com/
>
> The best data is for members only. It's worth it.
>
> Suffice it to say, we are seeing up to about an order of magnitude better results with some 100% carbon systems over the popular OEM solution.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Fade test data -- Aardenburg Imaging
2010-12-25 by edward wiseman
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.