Steadman Uhlich wrote: > In his letter to readers, the editor in chief says that digital prints do not have the tradition, heritage, and well....some other qualities he thinks important for collectors...given that they are made by "machine" and not in a traditional manner. So...from now on...this mag will not have any articles or feature any discussion of digital prints. Hm.... Cameras are machines too.. and so are enlargers! Why does B&W magazine feature photographs made be cameras and enlargers? In the end..... people make photographs. -Jeff
Message
Re: [Digital BW] B&W Magazine "drops" digital prints
2002-02-26 by Jeff Magidson