> > In his letter to readers, the editor in chief says that digital > prints do not have the tradition, heritage, and well....some > other qualities he thinks important for collectors...given that > they are made by "machine" and not in a traditional manner. > So...from now on...this mag will not have any articles or feature > any discussion of digital prints. > > Hm.... Cameras are machines too.. and so are enlargers! Why does B&W > magazine feature photographs made be cameras and enlargers? In the > end..... people make photographs. I am sure the magazine copy (words used in their articles etc.) is typed in using a computer, and the images are scanned in using some sort of pre-press scanner etc. That just comes across as "dishonest" on their part, IMO. Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] B&W Magazine "drops" digital prints
2002-02-26 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.