Just got the VueScan Bible, good source. Mark http://www.stillrivereditions.com On Jul 1, 2011, at 8:21 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > Apples/oranges: one wouldn't be scanning a negative if the camera in > question had digital output. In cases where we are able to use the same lens > on both analog and digital cameras, the color rendering characteristics of > the capture media (film or ccd) still come into play, so there's no way that > I can see to state positively that raw from the camera is better than raw > from a scanner. The Vuescan instructions state that the reason one might > want to same save scans as raw output is so that all other output formats > can be generated as needed without additional scans, and not because the raw > format is 'better.' Adobe's ability to read the Vuescan raw files is a > fringe benefit. > >> Of course a RAW from a scanner is not as raw as a camera delivers >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] VueScan
2011-07-01 by Mark Savoia
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.