>>> Ooooooh, David your being brutal...:-))... Don't shoot the messenger. This isn't breaking news and I'm not the investigative reporter. Sadly, it seems that in recent years newcomer photographers have decided not to learn anything from those who went before and so they are having to learn the hard way not to use junk materials. When it comes to papers, it is very simple: ACIDIC = BAD, NO ACID = GOOD 100% cotton rag papers contain no acid Best The newer "Baryta" papers have been de-acidified and presumably buffered Good, but not best Everything else contains acid and is bad. (With the exception of some Japanese and other similar material/process papers, which despite claims, DO TEST POSITIVE FOR ACIDS, are nonetheless considered acceptable by many.) Hint: When paper sellers want to disguise their junk papers they generally fancy up the names; the longer and more elegant the name, the poorer the paper. They especially like 'magic' words, like "deluxe", and "special". Another Hint: Makers of acid-free papers want to make damn sure you notice it. "100% cotton" and/or "acid-free" is plastered all over the box the paper comes in. If the box doesn't say it, it isn't. Instead the box says "super wonderful paper". ;-) David Kachel ___________________ Artist-Photographer Fine B&W Photographs www.davidkachel.com david@... Gallery: www.reddoorfinephotographs.com director@reddoorfinephotographs.com PO Box 1893 Alpine, TX 79831 (432) 386-5787 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] adhesion of print to mat
2011-10-26 by David Kachel
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.