In a message dated 2/28/2002 12:22:56 AM Eastern Standard Time, phil@... writes: > Vintage is still king, and > as yet there are no true vintage digital's out there. I remember reading in an article a while back that AIPAD considered a vintage print one which was made within five years after creation of the negative. (At this point I imagine within five years of the file would be similar). If that is the case, the prints we are making now, from files and negs which are less than five years old, should be considered vintage prints. I remember seeing prints at aipad which were only a few years old being referred to as vintage. George J Kunze [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Vintage Prints, was B & W Magazine Drops Digital
2002-02-28 by toomagenta@aol.com