Martin wrote, >Lenswork ... isn't anti-digital but [is] pushing silver fiber and >photogravure as the final output. They didn't feel that there would be much >of a market for inkjet prints of their "Special Editions." ... I confess I went through a period of using imagesetter internegatives and other ways to make "silver prints" that had, in fact, gone through a digital step. One reason was that the toned, fiber-based silver-print is considered the more archival and higher value product. However, my feeling was that it was not just the physical characteristics of the silver print, but the rejection of the digital step that was behind the price and "fine art" acceptance of the digital outputs. Whether the rejection of the digital step is rational or not is somewhat irrelevant in the short run if one wants to sell into that market. At any rate, part of my search for a digital silver-print workflow included finding an internegative that was so good that the purchaser or gallery could not tell that the print was digital. After thinking about that approach more, however, I decided such an approach would be just plain dishonest. Trying to hide the digital step might get one some sales, but ultimately someone will ask, "Did that silver print go through a digital step?" I was unwilling to lie about what I was doing. I also found that the imagesetters were not making prints that were totally lacking in artifacts. When I was using them the "stochastic" imagesetter outputs still had highlights with a fine "screen door" pattern that could be seen with a loupe. After trying a bunch of different workflows, I concluded that pigmented quads and inkjets were equal in visual quality (better than all but the best imagesetters) and much cheaper. Also, I have found working with service bureaus to be very frustrating. At any rate, the LensWork prints, being silver-prints but with the digital step (I assume) clearly disclosed is a reasonable compromise. But, to the extent the digital step is the problem, it still does not get rid of that prejudice, and I suspect the prices reflect it. Paul http://www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: [Digital BW] B&W Magazine "drops" digital prints
2002-02-28 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.