Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] I am thinking of getting rid of Lightroom

2012-01-12 by Walker Blackwell

Because it relies on an external DB/ThumnailDB system, you can catalogue off-line things like DVDs and externalHDs, etc. No file number limit. I know of some who have 500,000 item catalogues. Live search, and it will search assets using folder-structure tagging. AKA: if a bunch of images are in a folder called "Richard Avedon," and you type that into the search box, all sub-images will show up live even if they weren't tagged with anything.

best,
Walker

On Jan 12, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Mark Savoia wrote:

> I played around with LR a few years ago. Does it have the capabilities in its cataloging to keep track of multiple backup DVDs instead of a hard drive? And what are its search options, can you search by keywording, etc? Any limits on number of files or DVDs? I have been using Extensis Portfolio, but it has limits.
> 
> Mark
> http://www.stillrivereditions.com
> 
> On Jan 12, 2012, at 10:26 AM, Walker Blackwell wrote:
> 
> > For those who need fast rendering of 8x10 drum-scans I would recommend CaptureOne. It uses amazing graphics card stuff. LR4 has started to do this but still not as well. (It's beta though.) For database (keeping track of client files), LR is great. I've used it for years and rely on it every day.
> > 
> > For interpreting images, LR and all raw editors are still clunky. For saving out print-templates and job orders, etc, LR workflows are great! Especially when you can send to a ppd rip like ColorBurst or a hot-folder. I wish LR printed tif files instead of just JPGs for "print-to-file" though . . . 
> > 
> > best,
> > Walker
> > 
> 
> 



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.