I worked on the SG inks with Joe and with Lyson, (I was the second person in the US to receive a set) and have revisited them with Joe more recently. The real issues are as follows: Low saturation inks are made by mixing color with neutral pigments, and keeping both equally in solution is difficult (just ask Paul; he and I worked on several sets based on this premise for MIS). Newer printers with as many as three grays, two blacks and a gloss optimizer make it unnecessary to create other solutions. C. D. Tobie Global Product Technology Mngr. Imaging Color Solutions Datacolor.com CDTobie@datacolor.com On Jan 19, 2012, at 6:31 AM, Ernst Dinkla <e.dinkla@onsneteindhoven.nl> wrote: > Joseph Holmes' patented Small Gamut ink concept was in itself not a bad > idea in my opinion. It is another matter that Lyson used the wrong > approach with dye inks that would fade and it also paid not enough > attention to "metamerism" with those inks. Considering the higher > resolutions, smaller droplets of today's inkjet printers and far better > pigment inks available now I would expect a better Small Gamut printer > could be possible. In Paul's mixing the color inks are not avoided > either or better said they can not be avoided. Small Gamut inks should > fit OEM drivers easier than any other custom quad mixture I guess. Not > to mention adapted ICC color management. > > Any thoughts on this?
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Small Gamut inks revisited
2012-01-19 by Cdtobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.