Thanks, Paul. The one issue I'm still trying to resolve with the 1400 is a magenta cast (Lab A = 3 to 4 between 40%K and 95%K) on Canson Baryta Photographique. My setup is: LC C M LM LLC = LC 50-50 with GLOP Y=GLOP for second pass spray The magenta seems to be coming from the M and LM inks, but when I reduce them the print gets cooler, so I lose neutrality on the Lab B axis. Any thoughts? I love the Canson paper by the way, especially getting 97% of the tonal range between 0 and 100. Mark --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote: > > "mccarvill" <mccarvill@> wrote: > > > > Anyone using UT14 inks in an Epson 3880, or other 3.5 picoliter printer? > > > > I'm using UT14 in my 1400, and would like to replicate the look of my 1400's prints in a 3880. > > > The inks are certainly compatible with 3.5 pl printers. I've use UT14 LC in an 1100 "EZ" type of single-midtone-density system. > > However, a hextone needs 3 levels of gray -- like LLK, LK, and K. UT14, due to the 1400's 1.5 pl draw and the other goals of that inkset, used a LC that is LK density. The C (and M) are PKs. For matte paper the MK is enough darker that it works. For glossy paper, the C &/or M are used to generate the dmax. In a 3880, you'd have no separation between the UT14 C/M and the PK. > > You can make the cool LLK version of UT14 by mixing 30% UT14-LC with 70% MIS R800 glop base. > > For the LK and LLK, what I did was make a blend of the C and M channels. > > Hope this helps. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com >
Message
Re: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?
2012-03-09 by mccarvill
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.