Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: Will UT14 work in a 3.5 picoliter printer?

2012-03-09 by mccarvill

Thanks, Paul.

The one issue I'm still trying to resolve with the 1400 is a magenta cast (Lab A = 3 to 4 between 40%K and 95%K) on Canson Baryta Photographique. 

My setup is:

LC
C
M
LM
LLC = LC 50-50 with GLOP
Y=GLOP for second pass spray

The magenta seems to be coming from the M and LM inks, but when I reduce them the print gets cooler, so I lose neutrality on the Lab B axis.

Any thoughts? 

I love the Canson paper by the way, especially getting 97% of the tonal range between 0 and 100.

Mark 


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "Paul" <roark.paul@...> wrote:
>
> "mccarvill" <mccarvill@> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone using UT14 inks in an Epson 3880, or other 3.5 picoliter printer? 
> > 
> > I'm using UT14 in my 1400, and would like to replicate the look of my 1400's prints in a 3880.
> 
> 
> The inks are certainly compatible with 3.5 pl printers.  I've use UT14 LC in an 1100 "EZ" type of single-midtone-density system. 
> 
> However, a hextone needs 3 levels of gray -- like LLK, LK, and K. UT14, due to the 1400's 1.5 pl draw and the other goals of that inkset, used a LC that is LK density.  The C (and M) are PKs. For matte paper the MK is enough darker that it works.  For glossy paper, the C &/or M are used to generate the dmax.  In a 3880, you'd have no separation between the UT14 C/M and the PK.
> 
> You can make the cool LLK version of UT14 by mixing 30% UT14-LC with 70% MIS R800 glop base.
> 
> For the LK and LLK, what I did was make a blend of the C and M channels.
> 
> Hope this helps.
> 
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com
>

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.