And good centimes they are... I shoot Canon, but share all of your issues and sentiments. C. David Tobie Global Product Technology Manager Imaging Color Solutions Datacolor inc. cdtobie@... www.datacolor.com On Mar 12, 2012, at 6:22 PM, Louis de Stoutz <loudest@...> wrote: > On 12.03.2012 22:24, Bob Frost wrote: > > The D800 allows you to take 4 sizes of raw images - 36, 30, 24, and 15MP. > > Very interesting. I wonder if the reduced sizes would bring a reduction > in noise, which is depending on pixel density on the sensor, maybe it > wouldn't. > > Sorry to jump on the OT bandwagon, but this thread coincides with one of > my current preoccupations. I am a very happy user of a D700. It is this > camera which finally managed to make me accept digital picture taking. I > can use (almost) all my old lenses which I had bought as a teenager some > 40 years ago! (That's Nikon to you...) > > Since I have long been considering the purchase of a Hasselblad, I am > now very tempted by the D800, which I would complement with a Harrtblei > 40mm to provide for studio and architectural needs. > > Last but not least, the video capabilities of this camera are a major > asset to me, since it would allow me to do at last some > cinematographic-quality filming. The big problem with amateur and > semi-pro video cameras is the very small size of the sensor, because > this implies short focal lenses. You can hardly play with the separation > of planes, having constantly too much depth of field. The 24x36mm sensor > size of the D800 on the other hand is perfect. And you can use all those > wonderful lenses... And they all have a manual focusing ring, which is > the only way to do some watchable filming. > > Just mes 2 centimes > > Louis > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: The megapixel issue - "again" and other issues
2012-03-12 by Cdtobie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.