"sethrus" <seth@...> wrote: Sorry for chiming in here, but I'd like to be sure we are all talking the same language. So, here are some of the terminologies as I use them: > I presumed the black inks for B&W on the 2400 were mixed Ultrachrome. MIS has a family of "UltraTone" inks. "UltraChrome" is Epson's color inkset. > Apparently the Carbon 6 "Carbon-6" is the name I use for the inkset made from MIS Eboni MK and the generic base. "Eboni-6" is MIS's pre-mixed and sometimes pre-loaded version of this inkset. I use both, and the same profiles work with both. > is coming from the UT Eboni, Eboni MK is used in the UltraTone (UT) family of inks as well as in the Eboni/Carbon-6 family. The bases that are used to dilute the inks are different and should not be mixed. The UT base, which (correct me if I'm wrong) MIS is now labeling "ESC-BASEPT-UC" (aka "amber" base?) is for the UT family dilutions and keeps them glossy compatible. It does not work well as a dilution base for Eboni. Most in the past bought the MIS R800 gloss optimizer for diluting the UT inks, as the base was not sold as such. The Eboni-6 base also did not used to be made available. I'm not sure if MIS is going to do that or just make my generic base components and/or full mix available. I think making the generic base and/or its components available can be beneficial to many and improve the market. Paul www.PaulRoark.com
Message
Re: Home brew vs MIS ESC-BASEPT-UC
2012-03-12 by Paul
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.