On 03/20/2012 05:59 PM, mrjimbo wrote: > You may want to check into Snap Frames.. We had an event at the > Fairgrounds and this is what they used.. Ours were 24 x 36 and ran just > a little over 30 bucks each as I recall. They wanted an inexpensive > common look .. These came with a front lens to protect the print.. (not > glass) .. You'll still need a piece of foam core .. They come in various > sizes and are really cost effective and didn't look bad I thought.... > but certainly not a high end frame The frame sides are extrusions.. and > they snap together.. they came with a hanger too. I think you'd be hard > pressed to find something that looked better that was more cost > effective....... if you do please share it.. > > jimbo I have a snap frame like that above my desk. We have them here for ISO B formats, this one 50x70 cm. Anodised aluminium frame. I use it without the PVC foil protection. HP Matte Litho-Realistic paper + Vivera pigment and the print sprayed with a Talens acryl varnish that does not change the print appearence. Print vacuum mounted with 3M photo mount on museum board. Close to a year now and it still looks good. The idea was that if it did not last another image would replace it. So not really going for eternity but for the appeal of a bare matte surface without wasting an expensive rag paper. -- Met vriendelijke groeten, Ernst Shareware now: Dinkla Gallery Canvas Wrap Actions for Photoshop http://www.pigment-print.com/dinklacanvaswraps/index.htm | Dinkla Grafische Techniek | | www.pigment-print.com | | ( unvollendet ) |
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Cheap and possibly reversible way of mounting 22 by 30 Arches watercolor
2012-03-21 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.