Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Re: Need a Printer Recommendation

2012-04-26 by Bill Kennedy

As Nick pointed out in his earlier post, we've had excellent results over many years with an extensive Epson printer platform.


I would add: at K2 Press we use both Epson and HP printers. Our HP Z3100 has on-board profiling, which is a very nice feature with the upgraded software. However, the paper loading issues with HP should not be trivialized. Had they opted for something like the Epson--basically, gravity feed and manual loading, which makes it possible to print letter size and on non-traditional media easily (including papers with a deckled edge)--I'd be a very happy camper. But they did not and it creates nothing but problems.


Some papers, particular thicker or stiffer papers, either will not load at all or produce head strike problems with the HP. Basically, the engineering/design of the mechanism unfortunately limits the printer's usefulness.


Bill Kennedy
Professor of Photocommunications
Area Coordinator
St. Edward's University
Austin, Texas USA


K2 Press, Inc.
2832 East MLK Blvd., Ste. 105
Austin, Texas 78702



-----Original Message-----
From: richardeskin <richard.eskin@...>
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thu, Apr 26, 2012 10:48 am
Subject: [Digital BW] Re: Need a Printer Recommendation


  
    
                  
Been thinking about this myself.  Recent article in Digital PhotoPro:

"  The companies who have been most active in the professional printer market are Canon and Epson.  HP makes some strong contenders, and several top professionals are especially attracted to their very large models, but over the past few years, HP seems to have chosen to put more efforts into other parts areas of its business.  "

From what I have read on various forums, HP has great print quality, doesn't have the head issues of Canon or the clog issues of Epson.  They are initially somewhat more expensive, but seem to have relatively few maintenance issues.  I have read mixed evaluations of their service.  That said, if they aren't actively pursuing large format printing in the future, it could be a concern.  Check out Luminous Landscape and Northlight for some comparisons.

Good luck!

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "LouisD" <lou@...> wrote:
>
> I need some advice from the group on a new large format printer.
> 
> I've been using a Canon iPF6100 24" printer for the last 3 or 4 years and have been pleased with it for both color and B&W work. The weak point of this printer is the head life (less than 2 years, and at $500 each, and two heads per printer, it can get expensive. At least they are user replaceable). It never clogs, but when the heads go, they GO NOW!
> 
> I want to buy a 24" (or possibly a 44") wide printer. I print much more color than B&W, so I want good gamut and Dmax. I plan to use the driver with custom color profiles, not a RIP. Ink costs are always a concern, and so are clogs. Low maintenance is HIGH on my list of priorities.
> 
> My biggest problem is that I print only occasionally, usually in spurts, and sometimes I won't use my large format printer for 1–3 months at a time. I know that's begging for maintenance and head clogging problems. I guess I could farm out my larger work, but I lose control over the printing process, quality, etc., and as good as color management tools are, I still often like to print a 2nd or 3rd print to get exactly what I really want.
> 
> I'd appreciate any printer suggestions. I am also open to other advise. 
> 
> I'd even consider a reliable used printer (workhorse) that will accept 3rd party inks. 
> 
> Thanks in advance for your suggestions!
> 
> Lou Dina
>


    
             

  
 


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.