One other thing in my favor when I started selling Bodine. Everyone and their uncle had a digital camera and all these folks were shooting color. So, therefore, according to my retailers, Black and White was "new" again. There is a reflection of this in the Instagram filters that provide sepia and other b&w effects. And even after 12 years, Black and White is still desirable. --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, Tony Sleep <TonySleep@...> wrote: > > On 19/02/2013 12:09, David Whistance wrote: > > I was going to reply before but held off, however if you look through your > > analysis I think you will find that you have the maths wrong - you seem to > > be allowing $5 per print whilst his actual print prices are considerably > > higher than that, from 4 to 20 times from memory. Depending on the ratio > > of large to small prints sold that will make a significant difference to > > his bottom line. > > Hi David, > > That's me making a silly mistake then. I did assume a median price of $50 > per print, but somehow lost a zero. > > 30,000 * $50 is of course $1,500,000. Not $150,000 as I wrote. > > T/o of $125,000 year then, and overheads would likely be less than the 40% > I assumed, with that kind of volume. > > So I am impressed, and fascinated that this is (still) possible. That's a > probable profit ~GBP 60k, which would be firmly in the top few percentile > for income among UK pro's. > http://www.british-photographic-council.org/survey/2010 > > My apologies to all for the misdirection. > > > -- > Regards > > Tony Sleep > http://tonysleep.co.uk >
Message
[Digital BW] Re: Photography That Doesn't Suck
2013-02-19 by orbancc
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.