Digital BW, The Print

Hey .. it got a tad derailed but in the end it worked out..  we all got to see something.. So that's kool...

jimbo----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Tony Sleep 
  To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 7:46 AM
  Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: Photography That Doesn't Suck


    
  On 19/02/2013 12:09, David Whistance wrote:
  > I was going to reply before but held off, however if you look through your
  > analysis I think you will find that you have the maths wrong - you seem to
  > be allowing $5 per print whilst his actual print prices are considerably
  > higher than that, from 4 to 20 times from memory. Depending on the ratio
  > of large to small prints sold that will make a significant difference to
  > his bottom line.

  Hi David,

  That's me making a silly mistake then. I did assume a median price of $50 
  per print, but somehow lost a zero.

  30,000 * $50 is of course $1,500,000. Not $150,000 as I wrote.

  T/o of $125,000 year then, and overheads would likely be less than the 40% 
  I assumed, with that kind of volume.

  So I am impressed, and fascinated that this is (still) possible. That's a 
  probable profit ~GBP 60k, which would be firmly in the top few percentile 
  for income among UK pro's. 
  http://www.british-photographic-council.org/survey/2010

  My apologies to all for the misdirection.

  -- 
  Regards

  Tony Sleep
  http://tonysleep.co.uk



  
  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2013.0.2899 / Virus Database: 2639/6099 - Release Date: 02/12/13
  Internal Virus Database is out of date.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]