On 10/23/2013 05:52 PM, ben@... wrote: > Hi, > > > I recently found this 'scientifical' document about the long-term > effects of mounting digital ink jet prints to Aluminum and Dibond supports. > > I wonder if the traditional setup print+passepartout behind glass is > better or not. > > I talked with several people about it, but everyone seems to have > his/her opinion. > > Can I find somewhere good research results about this? > > This is the doc I talked about in the beginning: > http://www.queensu.ca/art/artconservation/research/projectsMAC/TessaThomas.pdf > > Thank you, > > Ben A. > Belgium Ben, It is a very short summary, nothing more than the usual research "poster". I tried to find the real article but couldn't. My main concern is the vacuum oven. That is a very rough method which heats the media but also dries it to unnatural levels. I have seen it used for roofing materials etc. I suspect that the RC polyethylene layers loose their flexibility fast and components of the Gudy mounting material create "solvent" bubbles in between the RC and the aluminium surfaces of both mounting board types. Both will not happen with a pure paper base print. If humidity would be varied instead the pure paper print may have more issues than the RC when mounted on aluminium. Not to mention the protection against abrasion. I am not in one camp and so far have only used Photorag prints mounted on aluminium and DiBond. Yesterday I did send a PR print to the lamination shop for mounting on aluminium, repeat job, a profile on the back of an aluminium mounted PR print was not glued properly and the print fell on the floor after 6 years. No complaints about the print quality, a Z3100 product, or the mounting method. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm December 2012: 500+ inkjet media paper white spectral plots.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Best way to mount prints
2013-10-24 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.