BTW, some time ago I looked into the fine print of this offer and I think it said the $9.99/mo. price was guaranteed only for one year after which it would update to whatever is then the current price. Others, here, may have additional information.
---In digitalblackandwhitetheprint@yahoogroups.com, <homershannon@...> wrote:
I signed up for the $10 cloud last night. Once you sign up, they download to you a console of applications you are eligible to use - this includes CS, Lr5 and half a dozen others I don't need or know. You only download what you want.
Therefore, if you are running a purchased version of Lr, I see no reason that you can't keep on using it and upgrade, if you need to, using the standard purchased software prices and download sites. You don't have to use the CC version of Lr.
Though at $10 a month, I can't imagine why you wouldn't want to. The price is a steal.
---In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, <e.dinkla@...> wrote:On 11/22/2013 05:14 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
> I made the switch to PS CC on the $9.99/month plan for several reasons.In Qimage Ultimate the RAW developer adds the filter data for rotation.
> One of the most important is that the new image resizing algorithms
> are much better (and, I believe, not available on CS6). I have been
> using Genuine Fractals, now called Perfect Resize, for years to up-res
> files. A "smart" up-res of 200% effectively increases the signal to
> noise ratio and is particularly valuable whenever one is going to alter
> the geometry of a file, including straightening (leveling), altering
> perspective, or stitching. Whenever a file's geometry is altered,
> information (sharpness) is lost. This loss can be minimized if a smart
> resize was done prior to the geometry correction. I've posted an
> example of the impact on the image here:
> http://www.paulroark.com/Perfect-Resize-comparison.jpg . PS CC's new
> up-res capabilities beat Genuine Fractals/Perfect Resize, and it's nice
> to not have to fire up a separate piece of software.
>
> Paul
> www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.PaulRoark.com>
At print time (or Print to File, Tiff export) I expect Qimage's
extrapolation tools + sharpening to handle that total. The route could
also be a Tiff export first after the upsampling and then using the
transform tools in PS CS 5.5. Qimage is limited on transformations and
post RAW editing in general. Though the Deep Focus Sharpening works very
nice.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=71495.0
I am more curious about deconvolution sharpening done in the best way.
Bart van der Wolf created a nice and more precise workflow:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=68089.0
but I would like to see more tools like that bundled to RAW development.
None of the RAW developers really covers all we wish them to have. It
should not be a problem to use a separate RAW developer, my old PS CS
5.5 for post RAW editing and then Qimage Ultimate for filing and
printing. Allows a 16 bit workflow where it counts. Qimage Ultimate is
the shortcut for less important work anyway.
--
Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst Dinkla
http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm
December 2012: 500+ inkjet media paper white spectral plots.
