On 17-04-14 01:51, Paul Roark wrote: > = Chris =- <baudec@...> wrote: > >> >> >> ...The Zony (Zeiss/Sony) looks great. In a couple of lines how many >> pictures were stitched? >> > > I stitched 3 vertical shots with the Sony 35mm, usig 1/3 overlap (rule of > thirds grid lines help). I used PS CC stitching, with the "cylindrical" > option selected. It was a quick test, not as wide as the 24mm (I often use > 6 frames for a pan). > > I was just curious how the Canon TS would hold up (not well). The 24 TS is > going to be used only for a very limited set of shots. (The 24-105 Canon L > zoom is way worse at the edge at 24mm and f/5.6.) > > Regarding my comment about the sharpness of the stitched approach being > able to be increased by first increasing the file size/resolution 200% by > one of the smart re-sizing programs (like the "automatic" option of PS CC > image size resampling) see > http://paulroark.com/Perfect-Resize-comparison.jpg . Any time the geometry > of an image is changed we lose some information. Using a good resampling > program first limits the effective loss. > > Paul > www.PaulRoark.com > I wonder where in that workflow you could introduce deconvolution sharpening for that 24mm. Based on what Bart van der Wolf explained and made available: http://www.luminous-landscape.com/fo...?topic=68089.0 http://bvdwolf.home.xs4all.nl/main/f...antedEdge.html A tool to pinpoint the sharpening and not overdo it. -- Met vriendelijke groet, Ernst http://www.pigment-print.com/spectralplots/spectrumviz_1.htm January 2014, 600+ inkjet media white spectral plots.
Message
Re: [Digital BW] [OT] 24mm v. 35mm stitched
2014-04-17 by Ernst Dinkla
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.