Digital BW, The Print

Others having more detailed knowledge than I can likely respond with more insight and certainty.

 

I believe that the two branded inks are incompatible on the paper, and artifacts are likely to occur.  Thus new profiles which incorporate the two "brands" of ink are not likely to be of value.  I would appreciate confirmation from others here.

 

If the gallery desires prints accomplished with Piezography branded inks then I suspect that even IF you could mix MIS and Piezography inks that the Gallery requires only ink sets available from Jon Cone; such inks carry the trademark of "Piezography".

 

As far as new profiles for the MIS MI BO set, I believe that Paul graciously posted a few new profiles for his BO work flow.  The link is probably on the PDF or article.

 

Elliot

 

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 06, 2014 5:25 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Digital BW] switch MIS K Eboni with Piezography Shade 1 ?

 

  

Hello,

For some reason, a gallery where I am willing to exhibit asks for Piezography prints; I actually use MIS MK BO. Is it an easy switch to use Jon Cone's Piezography Shade 1 as a replacement ? Would I need new profiles ?

Another question : all the QTR Curves I see for piezography never offers BO. Is there some incompatibility with it ?

 

Thanks !