That's an interesting point David. I thought that "Piezography" was a trademark that appropriately belonged to Jon Cone and alluded to all of his distinct inks-not simply carbon. Would one be able to use the admittedly awkward combination of, for example, "Piezography MIS Carbon Inks" or some such misleading statement? Is Piezography a general term that defines the process of printing black and white images digitally with pigment inks, or rather a reference to a distinct product line and process?
Then again, I am not a patent attorney and perhaps you are correct.
I was under the impression that Cone only marketed his B&W carbon inks under the Piezography name. Are you saying he calls his color inks the same thing? Could be. I don\u2019t know.
I was not implying or suggesting that the term Piezography does not belong to Cone or that it is generic. How you got "Piezography MIS Carbon Inks\u201d out of what I said, is a puzzle to me.
I was simply saying that in the mind of that gallery person, Piezography is probably a generic term. That does not mean that I think it is.