Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

RE: [Digital BW] switch MIS K Eboni with Piezography Shade 1 ?

2014-12-08 by Elliot Puritz

Simply pointing out where some confusion might arise David.not at all a
criticism of you of course.  

 

Let me stop here and wish you the very best and continued success.

 

Let the gallery suggest whatever inks they desire.:}

 

From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] 
Sent: Sunday, December 07, 2014 7:27 PM
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] switch MIS K Eboni with Piezography Shade 1 ?

 

  

That's an interesting point David.  I thought that "Piezography" was a
trademark that appropriately belonged to Jon Cone and alluded to all of his
distinct inks-not simply carbon.  Would one be able to use the admittedly
awkward combination of, for example,  "Piezography MIS Carbon Inks" or some
such misleading statement?  Is Piezography a general term that defines the
process of printing black and white images digitally with pigment inks, or
rather a reference to a distinct product line and process?

Then again, I am not a patent attorney and perhaps you are correct.

I was under the impression that Cone only marketed his B&W carbon inks under
the Piezography name. Are you saying he calls his color inks the same thing?
Could be. I don't know.

I was not implying or suggesting that the term Piezography does not belong
to Cone or that it is generic. How you got "Piezography MIS Carbon Inks"
out of what I said, is a puzzle to me.

I was simply saying that in the mind of that gallery person, Piezography is
probably a generic term. That does not mean that I think it is.

 

David Kachel

 

___________________

 

Artist-Photographer

Fine B&W Photographs

 

WEBSITE: www.davidkachel.com

BLOG: thetransparentphotographer.com

EMAIL: david@...

 

PO Box  93

Fort Davis, TX 79734

(432) 386-5787

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.