----- Original Message ----- From: "Paul Roark" <paul.roark@...> To: "DigitalB&WPrint" <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Monday, March 11, 2002 5:36 PM Subject: [Digital BW] MIS Neutral FS, First Impressions > > >Finally a new color of Piezo print! ... > > Yes, I thought we needed some new tones. This does leave me rather baffled as to why Conetech has not come out with alternate inks sooner since MIS seems to have been able to put the FS neutral together rather quickly. > > >First off the shades of gray are an excellent match to the Piezo inks. ... > > Let me know how the various paper profiles work. There is a chance the some > papers will have different characteristics with the MIS pigments than they > do with the Piezo ink. With the papers I use, they seem right on. I will but at the moment I am playing with the Sepia-VM in my second printer. > (snip) > > >... Not as cool as MIS VM with Paul's neutral cool curve but similar. > > I find it more neutral than the vm-nc curve. I assume we are all getting > the first production sample, but maybe MIS mixes really small batches. Is > your sample cooler than the vm-nc curve? (I test on EAM.) It is not as cool as the VM with the nc curve but still on the cool side. They looked less cool this morning but I think that is just subjective rather than any change. I am getting used to the tone. > > > I found it very close to an un-toned silver print which I think will > please >a great many people. > > The target was the average tone of a Kodak Polymax Fine Art, toned for 3 > minutes in selenium 1:19 (my standard procedure for silver printing). I have some Polymax Fine Art prints framed on the wall and I must have toned them much more heavily since they are on the brown side of neutral. > > >The prints on EAM looked more neutral than the several > >Hahnemuhle papers I tried. > > I don't test on Hahnemuhle. I've noticed with some of the papers I do use > that the tone will vary with paper -- and it's more than just the tone of > the paper coming through the highlights. The inks and coatings seem to > react in different ways. This is one of the advantages of a true neutral ink set. The color of the paper base then sets the color of the print. I think the Hahnemuhle coating is warmer than the EAM so the coolness of the ink may be more noticeable. As you say there can be a reaction between ink and coating which may push the color in unexpected directions. > > Frankly, that is one of the big advantages of the VM system. You may have > noticed the post I made the other day about balancing the "warm" curve for > the VM-sepia inkset. Very small amounts of toner in the base ink -- which > is the same as the FS-N -- allowed me to come up with a very neutral print. > I think that fine tuning is important for those of us who are picky. I can see where that would really help as I recall your ration of Y to M in the toner was 4 to 2. It would not take much of this to knock down the blue cast in the Neutral FS. > And, I > think each paper and printer type needs it. Realistically, those who learn > how to tweak the curves are going to be able to fine tune their systems and > get closer to the tones they want than the standardized inks or curves will > be able to do. I agree completely. This is why the prospect of an affordable RIP is so attractive. As you have found the RGB separation curves with the Epson driver work nicely with the four color printers but things get more difficult with the six ink printers. It seems that as you push towards the extreme of no toner or of full toner, the curves become more radical and it is harder to achieve a smooth tone ramp. With a RIP these problems would be eliminated. (snip) > > >... the Oriental Seagull is cool in the highlight and a little purple in > the >shadows. > > This is closer to what most like. The original target for the inkset is a > hair magenta. Frankly, MIS missed the target slightly. I haven't looked > into why yet. A hair magenta would definitely win my heart! I noticed when I got some drips that the solvent that bled out into the paper away from the center of the spot was definitely light blue. > > The cooler shadows are a problem for the black ink we have. It's a hair > warm. I'm going to be trying to make a neutral ink that might help here. I wish you luck! That would be very helpful as a starting base. > (snip) > > >So, Paul, how about a chocolate toned FS? Seriously, I know you have posted > a >formula for a Sepia toned FS but I think that there is room for a couple > >of more shades of FS inks. > > The sepia seemed to be the next thing on the list. MIS has to be convinced > from the user market, however, that there is enough demand to bother with > yet another ink. So far I have not heard any interest from their part. From an end user point of view there is room for many different color ink sets just as there are many silver papers (about 90!) available. From a production and business perspective this is probably not workable. I would think that 3 or 4 sets supporting the Piezo driver would be very saleable but I have no way of knowing for sure. Ultimately we may want to mix our own to achieve a unique look for our prints just as we did by choosing paper and toner combinations. It might me a viable product to sell a set of base inks, clear medium, C, Y, M inks and a booklet describing how to mix your own while maintaining densities close to the FS with some sample recipes. A similar kit for the VM would be nice too. I think that there are enough people who would like to stay with the Piezo driver to make this very attractive. Martin
Message
Re: [Digital BW] MIS Neutral FS, First Impressions
2002-03-12 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.