Digital BW, The Print

Robert,

You may be correct in that. I think that most glass filters UV to a 
certain extent just due to it's properties.

Any change we can get your great Museo with better dmax?

Mike


--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Robert Rex <chameleon@i...> 
wrote:
> At 09:52 AM 3/15/02 -0500, you wrote:
> >   ""<> wrote:
> > 
> >>""<> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> German glass installed at the factory)
> >> 
> >> 
> >>  I'll bet
> >> 
> > 
> > 
> > Sorry, accidentally hit the return key and sent the message 
prematurely.
> > What I was going to say was that I'd bet that it could have some 
UV blockers
> >  One of my cars had some kind of UV protection...
> > 
> > Lawrence
> > ----------------------------------
> > Lawrence W. Smith Photography
> > http://www.lwsphoto.com
> > lsmith@l...
> > ----------------------------------
> 
> Mike,
> This is correct.  While your results are interesting (and i had a 
customer
> who had a similar experience with Museo in the TX sun--although i 
don't
> think the paper turned "whiter.")  Most glass for cars do, in fact, 
have
> some UV inhibitors in them.  a better (informal) test would be to 
place a
> sheet under non-uv glass or directly under sunlight (ie, without 
glass).  
> 
> This is generally how laboratory fade tests are done.
> 
> Sincerely
> Robert Rex
> Crane & Co
> PLEASE NOTE:  WHEN REPLYING, ENSURE THAT EMAIL ADDRESS READS--
> 
> chameleon@i...
> 
> 
> IF THE "pop" IS PRESENT IN THE EMAIL ADDRESS, 
> DELETE THE "pop."  
> THIS IS IMPORTANT, 
> OTHERWISE I WILL NOT RECEIVE YOUR MESSAGE.