Austin Franklin wrote:
> > Then I recently read a post from Dan Margulis in another
> > group I participate,who says it really makes very little
> > difference,if any.
>
> Dan is specifically talking about color, for which he is right. That is
> easily explainable too. Color is 3 x 8 or 24 bits/pixel, where B&W is 8
> bits/pixel. His comment is absolutely NOT true for B&W.
>
>
Not only that, but even in COLOR if you need to correct an imperfectly
scanned original or a scan from an original where the tonal values are
extended, 16 bits is the way to go UNTIL you have done the work on the
curves/histogram.
The reason is simply that you may end up with images with multiple
values squeezed to overlap in a 8 bit image, while in a 16 bit they
could be mapped to differing values. Once you correct the spread of the
histogram/curves in 16 bit, you can now more easily map them to
differing values in 8 bit.. That helps prevent banding..
[Keith]
****************************************************************
CONFIDENTIALITY & COPYRIGHT NOTICE:
This e-mail message, including attachments and contents, is © Copyright,
Keith Krebs, 2001, All Rights Reserved. It is expressly for the sole use
of the intended recipient and may contain confidential and privileged
information. Absent the express written authorization of the author, any
unauthorized review, use, disclosure, transfer, or distribution is
explicitly prohibited and taken at your own risk. If you are not, or are
unsure whether you are, the intended recipient, please contact the
sender immediately and destroy all copies of the original message.
Violations will be prosecuted to the FULL extent allowed under
applicable civil and criminal law. Imagery published or distributed in
violation of these conditions shall be subject to a $1500/image
liquidated damages charge, in addition to any applicable Copyright
violation penalties.
[POV IMage Service Banner]
****************************************************************
{ The P.O.V. Image Service Website is still at http://www.p-o-v-image.com/ }
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]Message
Re: [Digital BW] 16 X 8 bits editing
2002-03-21 by Editor P.O.V. Image Service
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.