--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., Johnny Deadman <john@p...> wrote: > on 8/21/01 10:56 AM, Tyler Boley at tyler@t... wrote: > > Measuring dot gain with an instrument designed to do so may "suggest" > > just the opposite. > > when you do it get back to us! I did John, right when the Piezo inks came out. As well as the Lysonic inks. I think it's important to try to avoid implying any of these products are inferior based on our entry level tests that may wind up being totally irrelevant. Non of us are scientists, Wilhemn's current dilemma implies it's nearly impossible even if you are a scientist. I learned my lesson a while back when I screamed loud and clear because all my MIS prints turned reddish after a few weeks, suggesting the inks were very unstable. I quickly moved away from them as soon as other alternatives became available. This was before Piezograghy. As we know now, they are probably stable after the initial shift, so I may have done some irresponsible damage, the internet lets us do that. We need to be careful around here. My methods and chosen materials are best for me right now, and me only. It doesn't need to be turned in to a dogma to try and sell everyone. Tyler
Message
[Digital BW] Re: MIS & Piezo ink comparison -- "Kleenex chromatography"
2001-08-21 by Tyler Boley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.