Bill, I set the scanner resolution to scan at 364dpi, the Q-Factor to 1.0, and I set the output size at 20x20. The file becomes roughly 101mb or there abouts. The Howtek D400 has 364dpi as a native optical resolution. Unless I am missing something Howtek states that this is still considered an optical resolution and does not resample. As I am not an electrical engineer I do not profess to be knowledgeable on the subject of scanner theory. However, I have been told by Howtek that as long as one sticks to on of the optical resolutions (As provided in the chart with the scanner) all will be safe in the universe. Mike ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bill Morse" <willym@...> To: <DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 9:02 PM Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure) > Mike, I'm not sure I'm following you. Are you scanning the negative @364 > DPI or is the 20x20 print @ 364 DPI? > > If 20x20, then the actual scanner resolution is 3081 DPI - (20x364)/2.36 - > not exactly optimal if what you are trying for is scanner optical > resolution- although, come to think of it, maybe that's why you're seeing > less grain? [g] > > There must be something really simple I'm not getting... > > Bill > > > > on 3/21/02 7:59 PM, Michael Kravit wrote: > > Austin is 100% right. Run these tests and you will see the results clearly. > > One other thing that I have found is regarding grain. I find that by > scanning at the lowest possible optical resolution of the scanner will > reduce prominence of grain. That is on my Howtek D4000 if I scan at 4000 dpi > at 1:1 the negative grain is very clearly evident. > > If I choose a lesser opticacal scanner resolution (Howtek provides a chart > of the native optical resolutions) the PMT does not scan the grain and my > images exhibit less grain in the final print. For example a 6x6 negative > scanned at 364dpi (A Howtek D4000 Native Optocal Resolution) at a final > print size of 20"x20". > > Mike > > > Austin Franklin Wrote: > > The best image out you are going to get is to scan at the optical > resolution > > of your scanner, and size the print (not interpolating) and let the PPI > fall > > where it may, providing it's above a certain point. I've done dozens to > > probably near hundreds of comparison tests, and the overwhelming > conclusion > > is that this gives the best image. Also, everyone I've suggested this > > methodology to, has said the same thing. > > > > The reasoning is pretty obvious. Decimating the image information means > > that you are changing the image data that the halftone algorithm is basing > > its decisions on, and that will degrade your output tonality and > sharpness. > > Now, this isn't true with EVERY image on earth, but as a general rule of > > thumb, for me, it has held true. > > > > It is a very easy test you can do for your self. Scan an image, resize to > > your output size in PS NOT allowing decimation to take place, and let the > > PPI fall where they may to 240PPI. Print the image. Take the same image > > and check the little box in re-size to allow decimation, and then change > the > > PPI to 240. Print it out. See for your self ;-) > > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combingcure)
2002-03-22 by Michael Kravit
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.