Mike, I'm not sure I'm following you. Are you scanning the negative @364 DPI or is the 20x20 print @ 364 DPI? If 20x20, then the actual scanner resolution is 3081 DPI - (20x364)/2.36 - not exactly optimal if what you are trying for is scanner optical resolution- although, come to think of it, maybe that's why you're seeing less grain? [g] There must be something really simple I'm not getting... Bill on 3/21/02 7:59 PM, Michael Kravit wrote: Austin is 100% right. Run these tests and you will see the results clearly. One other thing that I have found is regarding grain. I find that by scanning at the lowest possible optical resolution of the scanner will reduce prominence of grain. That is on my Howtek D4000 if I scan at 4000 dpi at 1:1 the negative grain is very clearly evident. If I choose a lesser opticacal scanner resolution (Howtek provides a chart of the native optical resolutions) the PMT does not scan the grain and my images exhibit less grain in the final print. For example a 6x6 negative scanned at 364dpi (A Howtek D4000 Native Optocal Resolution) at a final print size of 20"x20". Mike Austin Franklin Wrote: > The best image out you are going to get is to scan at the optical resolution > of your scanner, and size the print (not interpolating) and let the PPI fall > where it may, providing it's above a certain point. I've done dozens to > probably near hundreds of comparison tests, and the overwhelming conclusion > is that this gives the best image. Also, everyone I've suggested this > methodology to, has said the same thing. > > The reasoning is pretty obvious. Decimating the image information means > that you are changing the image data that the halftone algorithm is basing > its decisions on, and that will degrade your output tonality and sharpness. > Now, this isn't true with EVERY image on earth, but as a general rule of > thumb, for me, it has held true. > > It is a very easy test you can do for your self. Scan an image, resize to > your output size in PS NOT allowing decimation to take place, and let the > PPI fall where they may to 240PPI. Print the image. Take the same image > and check the little box in re-size to allow decimation, and then change the > PPI to 240. Print it out. See for your self ;-) Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint Please follow these basic guidelines: - Include your full name with your message. - Include the address of your website, if you have one. - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." - Complete your Yahoo profile. - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various resources on the homepage. Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: scan vs. printer resolution (WAS: combing cure)
2002-03-22 by Bill Morse
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.