--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "James E. Martz" <jemartz@e...> wrote: (snip) > > Looks like some of the shine is wearing off, but still a tad pricey. I'd > have to think about it a bit (Maybe while the price comes down a bit > further. I'd like to stay under $1,000. And I'd like to be able to scan > some BW negatives (3" x 4") of my and my brother's and sister's weddings of > about 50 yrs ago, but I can't justify a huge expenditure for about 150 > negatives. > James, 3x4 is tough in a true film scanner. You would have to go up to the $4,000+ range with a glass film carrier. Say a Polaroid 45u at $4,200. What is the final print size you want for these 150 negatives? If you are planing prints in the 8x10 range or even 11x14, a flatbed scanner might do the job for you. Martin
Message
[Digital BW] Re:GF [Genuine Fractals] usage
2001-08-21 by Martin Wesley
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.