Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

[Digital BW] Re:GF [Genuine Fractals] usage

2001-08-21 by Martin Wesley

--- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@y..., "James E. Martz" 
<jemartz@e...> wrote:

(snip)
> 
> Looks like some of the shine is wearing off, but still a tad 
pricey.  I'd 
> have to think about it a bit (Maybe while the price comes down a 
bit 
> further.  I'd like to stay under $1,000.  And I'd like to be able 
to scan 
> some BW negatives (3" x 4") of my and my brother's and sister's 
weddings of 
> about 50 yrs ago, but I can't justify a huge expenditure for about 
150 
> negatives.
> 
James,

3x4 is tough in a true film scanner. You would have to go up to the 
$4,000+ range with a glass film carrier. Say a Polaroid 45u at $4,200.

What is the final print size you want for these 150 negatives? If you 
are planing prints in the 8x10 range or even 11x14, a flatbed scanner 
might do the job for you.

Martin

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.