Yeah...and I didn't give him a bogus inks sample!!! I'm exonerated!!! Robert On 3/24/02 10:43 AM, "Bill Morse" <willym@...> wrote: > Paul, I get this warm, fuzzy feeling whenever you write posts with lots of > numbers down at the bottom! LOL > > Seriously, after all the mud that some have slung at you on this and > (especially) certain other lists, most especially by the makers and > distributors of certain inkjet products, it must be gratifying to have your > original findings reconfirmed. It's just too bad that you had to go to this > additional trouble, instead of testing something new. > > I just wanted to say that I really appreciate your work and approach to > these questions. > > Thanks > > Bill Morse > PhotoProspect > Cambridge, MA 02139 > > on 3/23/02 10:50 PM, Paul Roark wrote: > > I re-ran this fade test to be sure the first one was representative. In the > first test, the sample came from a 3rd party. The new sample came from M&M, > an apparent distributor of Indelible inks. As before, the tests were on > Epson Archival Matte. > > I see no evidence that the first test was not representative of Indelible > black ink. The results of the second test at 100 hours are consistent with > the results of the first test. > > The bottom line results of the current 100 hour fade test are that Indelible > K fades and warms more than MIS VM K. The Indelible K has characteristics > closer to Generations Enhanced black than to MIS VM or FS black ink. > > A scan of the test strips is in the files section of the forum. The Files > section is at: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > Then go to > "Inksets, reviews and techniques" and see image > "Fade-Test-100Hr-Indelible(M&M)-K.jpg. > > The specific X-Rite densitometer readings for 100% black depth and fade > (100% visual density before and after 100 hours of exposure to the bright > florescent light) and midtone warming (change in 70% cyan-yellow difference) > for the current test are as follows: > > 100 % Black: > > Indelible 100% control visual density = 1.76; > Indelible 100% 100 Hr. fade v. density = 1.74; > Fade = 0.02; > > MIS VM K 100% control visual density = 1.69; > MIS VM K 100% 100 Hr. fade v. density = 1.68; > Fade 0.01; > > Gen Enhanced K 100% control v. density = 1.81; > Gen Enh. K 100% 100 Hr fade v. density = 1.79; > Fade 0.02. > > 70% (X-Rite readings for Cyan, Magenta, Yellow, & Visual): > > (Included below is a calculation of what I think is the best measure of > "warming" of the print -- which I think is a serious issue with quads. > Warming involves a tone change caused by the relative increase in red > [reduction in cyan] and reduction of blue [increase in yellow]. To > calculate this relative warming, I compare the cyan and yellow readings of > the contol and faded test strips. Warming tends to happend quickest at > first, stablilizing after about 300 hours. Relative performance at 100 > hours generally is an accurate predictor of relative performance at 300 > hours and on as long as I've done these tests.) > > Indelible K @ 70% Control: 0.70, 0.68, 0.68, 0.69; > Indelible K @ 70% 100 Hr: 0.66, 0.66, 0.68, 0.66; > Warming = change is cyan-yellow readings > = (.7-.68)-(.66-.68) > = 0.04 > Fade = (visual density change) = 0.03. > > MIS VM K @ 70% Control: 0.57, 0.57, 0.58, 0.57; > MIS VM K @ 70% 100 Hr: 0.56, 0.57, 0.58, 0.57; > Warming = (.57-.58)-(.56-.58) > = 0.01 > Fade = 0 (no measurable change in visual density) > > Gen Enhanced K @ 70% Control: 0.73, 0.70, 0.71, 0.72; > Gen Enhanced K @ 70% 100 Hr: 0.68, 0.68, 0.71, 0.68; > Warming = (.73-.71)-(.68-.71) > = 0.05 > Fade = 0.04. > > Paul > http://www.PaulRoark.com > > > Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and > other resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service > <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> . > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, Bookmarks, Polls and other > resources as they are often being updated. The page is at: > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - Include your full name with your message. > - Include the address of your website, if you have one. > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep > them short. > - As the topic of a thread changes remember to change the subject header. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or "flames." > - Complete your Yahoo profile. > - Before posting a question, search the message archives and the various > resources on the homepage. > > > > > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > > ---------------------- Robert Morrison rmorrison@... 310-397-2704 4131 Bledsoe Ave. Los Angeles, CA 90066
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Indelible Black Fade Test (M&M sample)
2002-03-25 by Robert Morrison
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.