Hi Martin... > Remeber Plane Geometry? The Postulate that says that any line segment > contains an infinite number of points? A tone has no width so there is no > limit on how many you have within a line segment on a tone curve. But measure those points on the line for me will you? Get it? > > > What would that mean in terms of your dynamic range equation? > > > > Your minimum discernable signal is now the limits of your eye. > > Then shouldn't were be looking at the limit of our eyes and not > the prints? But that's you putting the limit on this! > And if the prints all exceed the discernable limit of our eyes > wouldn't the > factor of interest then be the density range? Not necessarily. How do you know you have a full set of tones? Because you may reach the limits of the eye in one "range", doesn't mean it does across the entire print...hence posterizing ;-) > > > Is that because of the quality of the materials or how they were used? > > > > Could be either, and may be something else...and I believe that's image > > dependant. > > As in negative or as in the actual scene? Not quite sure what you mean here... Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Is dynamic range more important than density range?
2002-03-30 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.