> No offense Austin, but you really snipped out all my relevant points and > didn't answer much concretely. Sorry, I answered what I thought was important, and, what I believe, was quite clearly! > My main point was that for a formula that you suggests indicates > the number > of tones present in a print, based on sampling as few as three tones, No, my formula does not suggest that at all. It does suggest measuring TWO, dMax and dMin, but noise/smallest discernable signal may take many tones to measure. > You also did not speak to my premise that I think that a calculation of > tones from DyR is only possible if linearity is assumed, which is not > something I would take for granted in a silver print. You don't need linearity at all. Noise can be calculated using calculus, and integrated over the entire range of the print... Knowing math is not your strong point? I am guessing you don't know what integration is, in a mathematical sense? I can explain if you like. Regards, Austin
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Dynamic Range: For Austin
2002-03-30 by Austin Franklin
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.